Pioneering EDI Center outdated by today's technology and will be replaced in Athena by year's end
We've been running a cluster of mail servers here for years — since 1997 — under the Project 2000 name, with free accounts for every WinTOTAL user. Originally, we used mail as the EDI mechanism since it was reliable, easy to implement and understand, inexpensive, and could be used for messaging (two way conversations), not just delivery. Also, at the time there were substantial limits on file sizes which could be transmitted through an ISP's mail account, plus there were proprietary systems (Value Added Networks, or VANs) under development and being promoted by big players, and we didn't want to see appraisers be stuck with an expensive, inflexible method becoming the standard means of EDI delivery. We "seeded the market" with free Project 2000 accounts, and we're happy to report, at least in the appraisal arena, VANs have almost totally failed to deliver.
Today the landscape is quite different. Everyone doing EDI has at least one personal e-mail account and they're familiar with e-mail software such as Outlook™. 1997 was a long time ago! Viruses and spam make mail less attractive overall as a delivery medium, and more expensive to provide as a service. XSites and the new XSites Network, with SureReceipts functionality, use e-mail as the delivery notice medium but not the delivery vehicle for the actual report, and they're very effective. CertMail accounts come with each Professional and Enterprise level XSite. And overall, there's no longer a need to "seed the market". The seeds took root and now it's overgrown, as a matter of fact. We now deliver many millions of e-mails a month through our servers.
Fully 14 percent of our tech calls — several thousand a month — stem from EDI. Because we insert ourselves in the middle of the process, it's easy for the appraiser to call us first, and then to disbelieve us if we see ISP or connection problems at their end. As a result, the EDI calls are not just a large number, but are disproportionately lengthy.
The EDI Center's main purpose in life was to read your mailbox and determine which messages applied to WinTOTAL based on the headers, and leave the rest alone, and allow you to correspond with those who e-mail you on appraisal matters where needed. But with XSite Network orders and popup alerts, as well as CertMail and your own mail systems from ISPs, that's not necessary any longer. So, in the coming weeks we will be removing the EDI Center completely.
Sending EDI will be similar appearance-wise to the current method, but will either be via your XSite or your own mail program. Via your XSite, there will be everything you do now (and more), including SureReceipts. We will support sending via your mail program, such as Outlook™ or Outlook Express™, and in those cases we'll use Microsoft's MAPI programming API to generate a subject, body, and attachments based on the same configurable parameters as now. The message will be handed to your e-mail program, much like how it works when you click on a "mailto" link in a web page — your default e-mail program loads, sometimes with pre-loaded message data passed by the web page. Once your mail program loads, the rest is up to you, your program, and your ISP. We're out of the "connection" loop entirely. There will be no mail sending functionality actually in our code — we'll write a message and pre-load it into your e-mail program, but then it'll be up to you to press "Send" and make sure your e-mail program is set up correctly.
We'll actually be changing this before Aurora even ships, via an update to Athena that is tentatively scheduled for November (with EDI disabling to be completed in December). After the update, everyone will have 30 days or so to close out any Proj2000.com accounts and notify others that the addresses have changed. Anyone with a CertMail account will have automatic forwarding enabled at the switchover time, so any messages coming in to their Proj2000 account will not be bounced and will instead be routed automatically to their CertMail inbox.
For those of you with XSite Order Manager (nee Mercury Desktop) or an XSite, this won't have any effect at all. Sending via an XSite "post" is more reliable anyway, and provides the client with a repeatedly downloadable PDF of the report. Those without an XSite will simply see the data being passed to their default mail program, usually Outlook.
This will remove a ton of old legacy code and really enable us to stop spending developer and tech resources supporting something whose time has come and gone. The new method of delivering via posting to an XSite is far more valuable and solves problems that e-mail can't solve anyway.
We're very proud that our development and deployment of a free EDI appraisal report delivery method ensured that pay-for-play VANs didn't take hold — and take a ton of your money. Now, we're moving to the next phase of EDI, which will be more secure, simpler, more effective, save time and hassle, and generate more business and more revenue for you. We apologize for the inconvenience inherent in changing your e-mail address, but hope otherwise you're as excited about this brave new world as we are.
Some spin advocacy as distortion when it comes to our e-Newsletter
We've never made any bones about being on your side — certainly not in the pages of our e-Newsletter. Once a week we try to give you the good news about your profession, where most real estate and broader media focus on the bad. We do this truthfully, diligently, and have our facts straight. We're not new to the appraisal industry — we know how it works. We know what hasn't worked. AVMs haven't worked. Pay-for-play VANs haven't worked. And we say so.
Some say we try to scare you into buying from us. Like when we call another company on funneling some of your money to an AVM provider. We tell you you shouldn't be scared of AVMs — not only can you compete with them, you can run circles around them. We're not trying to scare you, or smear anyone who does things differently. We tell it like it is.
The remainder of this tale will be of little interest to most of you, because it involves an "I said, you said, she said" that always makes people uncomfortable. But the October 11 edition of Appraisal Intelligence, a subscription-based newsletter billing itself as "Real Estate Valuation News and Analysis," devoted its cover story to a piece-by-piece critique of a story of ours in our July 27 edition entitled WaMu to undertake "complete overhaul" of mortgage operations, cut more mortgage jobs by a former Vice President of WaMu.
The critique does not withstand serious scrutiny, and we're confounded as to a reason that squares with journalistic ethics why Appraisal Intelligence would have proceeded this way. Appraisal Intelligence contacted us for a "corporate response" to vague "questioning" of the "validity and credibility" of the story. We asked for specific "questions," and were given quotes to respond to. We did. But none of the specific "questions" about the piece's "validity and credibility" were given to us in advance to respond to. Our response never made it into the article. Not contacting us at all and offering "equal time" after the fact would have been one thing, but we were misled, likely so that the article could end by (truthfully) saying they had "talked to us" and would provide details in their next issue.
No need to wait. If interested, please read our original story, linked above; the Appraisal Intelligence story (we offered to provide you with the full text of the story so you could read it for yourself in its entirety and in context, but Appraisal Intelligence did not take us up on our offer, so only subscribers will be able to read the story linked), and then our blow-by-blow rebuttal to the frankly misleading, confusing and borderline libelous piece.
We doubt very many of you subscribe to Appraisal Intelligence and as we said are uninterested in a "he said, she said" story. That's why we've linked them separately. We do have business partners we work with who may have read the Appraisal Intelligence piece and be left with the impression we slam lenders and companies in our e-Newsletter with no basis in fact, and those are damages, if they materialize, that we'll keep track of. Please, proceed with the links above only if interested, and otherwise, be assured that we know who we're writing for, we know our and your business, and we would never intentionally misrepresent or misstate any fact whatsoever to advance some underhanded agenda.